Tag Archives: WWII

Third Reich Pilgrim Part II: Ghostland. Book Release.

THIRD REICH PILGRIM Part II: Ghostland – Book Release

Book is now available for purchase – AUD$29.95 – please email hermitage75@yahoo.com.au for payment and shipping details.

I will write a little synopsis later on.

Here are the Chapters:

I – The Kingdom of Blood And Iron

II – The Mythos of Germania and the Reich

III – The End of Berlin

IV – Goslar and the Heart of Germany

V – Operation Kyffhauser

VI – The Green Knights of Totenwald

VII – Walhalla on the Danube

VIII – The Treason Within


Fake War – The Penultimate Truth

All extracts taken from Philip K Dick’s The Penultimate Truth.

One has to extract the parts of this mosaic literary work that are relevant in serial logical form. The rest of the book can be expurgated. In all Philip K Dick’s books that I have read, and I have read so far about 6 or 7, there is several layers of writing, like many books, going back to the Norse and Greek Myths and the Biblical Canon, where there are several layers which are woven together, often proving rather contradictory. It’s woven together from many threads, as I discussed in TRP Part I, the “text” referring to textum in Latin, which is a woven fabric – so I write about the “Weavers Guild” of Germany being the first book makers. But all the Guilds worked closely together to produce the first books, as it was such a massive operation, it took the combined efforts of all the industries of humans. Now this has been done for reasons other than money, because there is no profit in making books, books, are massively subsidized. We see books today that can be purchased new for $5.00 retail, however, the true cost in making that same book, would be in the order of $50.00…That is without the marketing and advertising, if one adds in the enormous costs of marketing and advertising books, the figure is ???? Who knows…And there are millions of books produced each year that nobody even reads, and yet the costs are still there – there is no profit in the book business, nor in publishing, and most of the names credited as “authors” are actors, who knows, Philip K Dick was probably an actor too, most notable “writers” are not the actual writers but are front men and women, they play the part of the writer, while the true authors are unknown. I mean, with, for example Philip K Dick, there is no way one man could have encoded a book with such penultimate truths at the time he did, alone. Even today with the vast Internet available to us, which is also described in the book under different names, even today, one man would find it impossible. The book was written in 1964! Interesting also, not just the Fake War parts, but the description of Flat Earth, and also many descriptions of the faking of archaeology, the book goes into some depth on how the fraud of archaeology is organised. Certainly this is way too advanced in knowledge for the time.

 

“Only here, in this day and age, as speech the speech had just pointed out, they had been born onto the surface of a world and now that surface with its air and sunlight and hills, its oceans, its streams, its colours and textures, its very smells, had been swiped from them and they were left with a tin-can submarine – figuratively – dwelling boxes in which they were squeezed, under a false light, to breathe repurified stale air, to listen to weird obligatory music and sit day-long at work benches making leadies for a purpose which – but even Lantano could not go on here. Could not say, for a purpose you dont know. For each of us here above to argument our retiues with, our entourages which wait on us, follow us, dig for us, build, scrape and bow…You have made us barons in baronial castles, and you are the Nibelungen, the dwarves, in the mines; you labour for us. AND WE GIVE YOU BACK READING MATTER.”

“Both military establishment, those of Wes-Dem and Pac-Peop, had provided him with financial and spiritual assistance – as well as the fabulous film clips of World War Two which each establishment held in its classified film libraries. The twin documentaries, contrived so as to be released simultaneously…Joseph Adams fitted his eyes to the spool scanner he thought to himself that they should have been able to remember enough to recognise what they saw on their TV screens to be a pure lie. Before his eyes appeared the tiny, illuminated and clear image of Adolf Hitler, addressing the hired flunkies who constituted the Reichstag of the late 1930’s. Der Fuhrer was in a sardonic, jovial, mocking, exited mood…his voice rising with each, and with each the hired flunkies jeered in synchronization…The emotionality of it all…The roars of the flunkies…Joseph Adams watched, listened, felt inside him a resonance with the roars, a sardonic glee in company with Hitler’s – and at the same time he felt simple, quite childlike wonder that this scene could ever have truly taken place.”

“It was the British who had brought about Buchenwald, was Gottlieb Fischer’s revised history. Not the Germans. The Germans were the victims, in 1943 as much as 1919. A later scene in Documentary A would show Berliners, in 1944, hunting in the woods surrounding Berlin, searching for nettles to make soup. The Germans were starving; all continental Europe, all people inside and outside the concentration camps, were starving. Because of the British.”

“The Wes-Dem TV viewer would discover that England, France, Germany and the United States should have all been allies. Against the authentic evil-doer, Josef Stalin, with his megalomanical plans for world conquest….The scene which opened episode four of version A. Advancing the spool, Joseph Adams halted at the episode and put his eyes to the scanner, this modern technological crystal ball into which one gazed to know – not the future – but the past. And. Not even the past. Instead, this fake which he now witnessed. Before his eyes a film sequence, narrated by the maddeningly ubiquitous Alex Sourberry and his oily, skillful murmur. A scene vital to the overall moral version of version A which Gottlieb Fischer, backed angelwise by the Wes-Dem military establishment….A deliberate, carefully manufactured fraud…To think that what we are now derives from such crude sleight-of-hand…since the documentary had been universally accepted as historically correct, as documenting the sell-out at Yalta, the misunderstood Adolf Hitler who had really only been trying to save Western Democracies from the Commies…And all it took was a few juxtaposed shots of British warships and starving camp victims, a few entirely faked scenes that simply never had actually occurred…And the soothing voice which tied it all together. Soothing – but firm.”

“In World War Two England and the US only seemed to fight Germany…technical errors occur…First of all, in World War Two there was no US Air Force…Prop Planes…The monad wanted me to see…our collective, historic efforts from the very beginning, starting with these two documentaries, has been marred. When you and I go out to fake things you and I and all the rest of us are just plain bound, at some place, sooner or later, to slip up.”

“…he tore himself loose from the tunnel, scrabbled and clutched at the clammy, flat earth which was surface earth; horizontal, with no end.”

“Our fake-producing factory, he thought, demands a lot from us; we may be the ruling elite, but we are not idle.”

“We are, Adams realized, a cursed race. Genesis is right; there is a stigma on us, a mark. Because only a cursed, marked, flawed species would use its discoveries as we are using them.”

“The fakery had gone that deep…They don’t work…If I could make them really work I could take over the world.”

“They share film studios in Moscow…Just like they share the New York Agency. Some talented Commie producer named Eisenbludt; he stages all the scenes of destruct you see on your TV screen. Usually its in min – done in scale. Sometimes, though, its life-size. Like they show the leadies fighting. He does a good job. I mean, its convincing; I remember and sometimes, when the TV set we have up here is working, we manage to catch it. We were fooled, too, when we were below. He, that Eisenbludt, and all the Yance-men; they’ve fooled everybody almost, except sometimes tankers do come up anyhow. Like you did.”

“And derived his Fuhrer, not from his own creativity, his artistic genius, but from simple observation. And who would Gottleib Fischer, circa 1982, be seeing? Actors. Hundreds of them. Sorted over to play roles in his two vast phony documentaries – actors picked especially for their ability to portray world leaders. In other words, actors who had charisma, the magic…. What the documentaries lacked were proper credits; who played what great world leader; we need that list, and the list does not and never did exist; it was carefully not made.”

“Is that what rules the millions of tankers today, the actor who struck Gottleib Fischer as just right to undertake the task of impersonating Hitler.”

“Its was spurious. Laid down deliberately by Gestalt-macher. Fakes. That’s what makes up the Gestalt, clues like that, profile indicators.”

“We have here, Adams, the ultimate factory of manufacturing hoaxes.”

“In that spurious, utterly faked scene contrived by Gottleib Fischer.”

“Because you know; and I know why you know, and you realise this. We are no longer in the quagmire of fakes, now; this is real. What are you, what I am aware of, due to the photo graphic records taken by my satellite.”

“We are cursed as a  race, all right, Foote said to himself; Genesis is right.”

“Because, he said to himself, I’m going to tell them the truth.”


Third Reich Joke of the Day

American soldiers “re-purpose” a German Sturmgeschutze III tank. Great idea, I mean, the Americans would not get very far in their Sherman props, so just use German props instead, at least they worked. This would not create any confusion in the “chaos of war zones”, no not at all, because as you can see, the German Balkenkreuz has been painted over and an American military star painted on, so it’s easily recognizable at long distance, especially in the smoke and haze, rain and mud, and at night time; and the brave young men were all trained to work the “enemies” machinery and tanks, so they could just re-purpose, a lick of paint, jump in, and away you go to Berlin! Planes could easily tell the difference from the air also: “Oh, that’s our boys down there in a German tank, a cuckoo crew, hold fire.”

From “Fielding Captured Weapons: The Allied and Axis Approaches” –

Using the captured weapons and equipment of an enemy is commonplace during war. Frontline soldiers often find themselves short of what they need to accomplish their missions and quickly become ingenious at filling these holes in their order of battle with whatever they can find, capture or pilfer.”

You see, it’s written in military technical jargon, so it must be true. Young, brave men, with little training, no experience and hardly any education, are natural geniuses who can adapt quickly, without instruction, to any chaotic Frontline war zone, easily taking possession of highly technical weapons and equipment of their enemies and then using it against the enemy, to “knock them out” with their own weapons, and this is commonplace, happens all the time in war, and it is very effective. It is known, for example, that the British used to like adopting German tanks also, instead of using their own M13/40s, they would just capture some German Tiger and Panther tanks, get the Germans to surrender, which the Germans were very good at, and then jump in and continue on in the German tanks. Often the Germans would then continue on with the British, working as captured crewmen and mechanics in the Cuckoo Tanks, to keep the tanks going for as long as possible, so that more and more German tanks could be captured and re-purposed. To avoid any confusion in the field and to avoid friendly fire, the tanks were painted with easily identifiable identifications, or a flag, or something. Or just left as they were for a sneaky ambush.


The Art of War


Spotlight

A Photograph of a Searchlight in Berlin to Defend Against Air Attacks, circa 1940. (Photo by Fotosearch/Getty Images)

 

2-G56-B1-1940-49
Heavy anti-aircraft gun ready for action
History / World War Two / Aerial Warfare
– Heavy anti-aircraft gun of the German
air defence ready for action. –
Photo, 1940.
From: journal ‘Signal’, French edition,
vol. 1, no. 17, 1940, p. 17.

A searchlight is a spotlight, used in the Theater of War just like it is used in stage shows, fairs, and festivals. The corporations who made the searchlights and spotlights are identical. So the same technology was used in the night time war theatrical scenes that was, and is still used today, in entertainment industries: Movie premiers, advertising, opera, stage shows, etc… Art festivals and lightshows are more popular than ever, and one can also think of night clubs, music concerts and raves. The “Tribute of Light” now represents the World Trade Center in New York. This ceremonial use of spotlights has its popularization with the “Lichtdom”, or Cathedral of Light used in Third Reich Parties or Nuremberg Festivals, which have a long German tradition. The technology used in spotlights is the same technology that is used in movie and cinema projectors. War is another form of cinema, it can be seen as comedy or tragedy, but it is not real, or it is real only in the way a movie is real or a stage show is real. It is often stated by the media and in literature in relation to war: “it is not a movie, you know. It’s real”… This is just a deliberate and brazen attempt to fool the viewing public into believing that war is real… But the truth is, that war is just a movie, and everything related to war, like politics, is just a movie also. It’s merely stagecraft and the stagecraft is what is real.


Props for the “Battle of Moscow” Opera

Here is a photograph of a “war prop” a dummy plane from the Russian Newsagent Pravda. The people in Moscow are coming to see the stage set designs for the Opera “The Battle of Moscow” which they will all be taking part in… Everybody knew it was fake, and that it was all just a Grand Opera. They decided to lie about it to their children and grandchildren because it gave them an angle of sympathy by which they could deceive their children into believing fairy tales with scary bombing stuff in them and bogey men like “evil Nazis” and stuff, and how their parents and grandparents must have been so brave to fight off such evil… The Russians learnt this generational trickery from their Masters – The Germans, who have taught them everything they know….


Extract from TRP Part II

My thoughts turned to the Eastern Front. After the World War II, the Soviets themselves did not even know how they were able to win the war. The several hundred German Generals that were captured by the Allies did not know how they had lost the war, together they concocted a pastiche of feeble alibis in an attempt to explain what happened, when they were pressured to do so, by various means, by their new employers – the United Nations. There were no actual records of what actually happened, nobody knows what actually happened, so the Americans invented the records and the documents in the 1980’s. Up until that time, the explanation as to what happened during Operation Barbarossa was based only on eye-witness reports from the Germans. (See Jonathan M House). The German Generals stated their three major alibis as being:

  1. Hitler was incompetent and interfered with military matters;

  2. Extreme weather and terrain;

  3. Waves of fanatical Soviet Soldiers.

In regards to the first point, Hitler was Supreme Commander of all German Armed Forces, or so he was meant to be according to the records. So then, I would remind the German Generals of their Oath: ʻI swear to God this sacred oath to the Führer of the German Reich and Volkes, Adolf Hitler, Supreme Commander of the armed forces, I shall render unconditional obedience and that as a brave soldier I shall at all times be prepared to give my life for this oath.ʼ To claim that Adolf Hitler was incompetent is contrary in the first instance because his military record proves him to be the greatest military commander of all time and the Supreme Commander, therefore any disobedience is punishable by death, this is in accordance with the Third Reich military standards. Basically if Hitler was indeed Supreme Commander then he cannot be incompetent as Supreme Commander, because all those under him had elected him as Leader and vowed to serve him unconditionally till death. The Generals should not have sworn the oath if they did not believe it! In this case they are liars and traitors. The oath does not say that the brave soldier should surrender his weapons to the enemy and then lie about what happened afterwards for the rest of his life!

The second point of extreme weather and terrain is a moot point; no General blames the weather and terrain for a loss when the enemy he is fighting is using the same terrain and experiencing the same weather. Hitler, in regards to this, states that the German armed forces were provided with the best equipment and weapons and clothing and shelter and rations and supplies, far better than the Russians, so the German Generals cannot blame the weather for their surrender. I will point out that no surrender under any circumstances is acceptable by Third Reich military standards.

By the end of 1942, with their superior equipment, machinery, better trained troops with more experience and more advanced weaponry, the Germans had gained nearly all of the significant and usable land in Russia; to take back this land would have been much more difficult for the Russians than for the Germans to hold onto it, no matter what the weather conditions were, considering all realistic military endeavour. The weather conditions would have a greater detrimental effect upon an offensive military campaign rather than on a defensive military action and the Germans were in a defensive position and the Russians were thus forced back and had to regain the territory they had lost, so the Russians would have had to take the offensive at the worst time possible. Therefore the adverse weather conditions and terrain in late 1942 and into 1943 would have favoured the German defensive positions and not the Russian counter-offensive attacks. It can also be added that the Germans had the support of the Russian civilians and peasants who welcomed the Germans as their liberators from the yoke of Bolshevik Russia.

From the examples of the first stages of Operation Barbarossa and the Russo-Finnish war, the third point must be a fabrication, because the Russian soldiers were far from fanatical, indeed the Russians themselves claimed that they frequently had to ʻpurgeʼ their ranks, even their generals were ʻpurgedʼ because of lack of fanaticism! It’s hard to imagine from where the great waves of fanatical, and expertly trained, and well disciplined Russian soldiers materialised from, given that most of the Russian soldiers had been captured in their millions by the Germans during the first stages of the war. It would be impossible to replace the first soldiers with even better soldiers, because these first soldiers and officers and generals would not have been able to train and discipline the new Russian recruits in time for the counter-offensive because they had been either captured or killed, according to the ʻmilitary reportsʼ. The entire demographic structure of said ʻreserve armiesʼ was developed in Germany, therefore any notion of the Russians being able to produce great waves of reservist troops would have been reliant on learning that process from the Germans in the first place (As Panzer General Hoth confessed to General von Manstein – “The Russians have learned the art of war from us.”). In any case, I would then submit to the German Generals: how did their own German, first-line, professional, battle-experienced troops, lose to ill-trained Russian reservist troops, whom had no battle experience? How did the Russians somehow manage to muster, from sparsely populated areas deep inside their own wilderness, a fully professional and experienced fighting force adopted from a German system? Where did these phantom armies of fanatical Russian troops come from? One can draw all the imaginary army groups with graphics and glyphs on maps but that is not evidence. Maps and graphics are not evidence, neither are films and war propaganda footage, especially when they are produced years, and sometimes decades, after the war has ended. I submit that the greater part of Russia, where the greater demographics of Russians were located and where all significant infrastructure and navigable land had already been liberated by the Wehrmacht and the Waffen SS, liberated in the sense that it was under the control of Germany and the population therein along with all infrastructure, resources and so on, was under the firm control of the Germans which had the full support of the Russian civilian population, which were, for the most part, of German descent themselves (as it was the Germanic peoples that originally settled the Russian lands). And I would also point out that Moscow had been cut off from Leningrad and Stalingrad, and that 90% of all Russian infrastructure, farming land, sea ports, factories, roads and railways had already been captured and were in German hands. I might add that the Germans had also taken the oil refineries in the Caucasus, and so where did Russian produce their oil? In the non-oil producing region of the Ural mountains? Yet regardless of the geographics, petroleum is synthetically produced! Which is the great secret of the petroleum industry. The technology to produce oil and petroleum did not come from Russia but came from Germany. Oilfields are a myth created by the oil industry; in the 21st Century, it is now known, that all oil and petroleum is produced in factories and distilleries, and that the Russians, or anybody else, could not have constructed the oil and petroleum synthetically in factories without German assistance, let alone move huge industrial factories and plants around as though they were moving children’s blocks of lego pieces.