Category Archives: Third Reich Pilgrim

Third Reich Pilgrim Part II extract

I stood alone, in the fading afternoon light, contemplating the great home of the Prussian dramaturgy – that most significant contributor in the morphology of fanciful stories and stagecraft of universal history. The imaginations of set-designers and opera composers had transmogrified their festive costumed clowns into great tyrannous Gods of Historicism! I was beginning to wonder how much my puny individual brain could take before it overloaded and broke down completely. How could I change my thoughts, change my ideas, become new. Be a Neo-Nazi! As I am, changing everything there is in the world with my revolutionary thoughts, through magic gateways of the werewolfen Reich. I am the REICH! New Reich Awaken!

The wall of the Neue Wache was a pale screen onto which I projected my thoughts, under the darkening boughs of forlornly shaped trees, my thoughts plunged deep into the ages of man, through labyrinthine constructions and dimensions of overwhelming complexity, a single thread tied me to another realm and another I beyond this existence, I clung to it, like a dangling mountaineer on a precipice, staring down into a frightful blackened abyss below with only my own consciousness for a torch light. I had the strange feeling that no man had ventured this far into the Labyrinth and lived… Do I climb back up the rope, or do I keep going down, down into ageless, incomprehensible fathoms, untrodden by all who had come before me? I wanted to cast my crown of futility into the endless void and detach myself from the trifling shreds of decaying narratives that plastered the props and sets of this staged burlesque called Life’; the humans were Life Actors, acting in a Theatre of Life, connected via some monolithic integrated circuitry each human is now a small chip, equipped with a quartz receiver and a fused silica photomask little code-carriers of Werner von Siemens’ technologies. The electronic locomotive train itself was a product of Werner von Siemens and his Berlin Corporation. The ancestral home of the Siemens family is Goslar…


Extract from TRP Part II

My thoughts turned to the Eastern Front. After the World War II, the Soviets themselves did not even know how they were able to win the war. The several hundred German Generals that were captured by the Allies did not know how they had lost the war, together they concocted a pastiche of feeble alibis in an attempt to explain what happened, when they were pressured to do so, by various means, by their new employers – the United Nations. There were no actual records of what actually happened, nobody knows what actually happened, so the Americans invented the records and the documents in the 1980’s. Up until that time, the explanation as to what happened during Operation Barbarossa was based only on eye-witness reports from the Germans. (See Jonathan M House). The German Generals stated their three major alibis as being:

  1. Hitler was incompetent and interfered with military matters;

  2. Extreme weather and terrain;

  3. Waves of fanatical Soviet Soldiers.

In regards to the first point, Hitler was Supreme Commander of all German Armed Forces, or so he was meant to be according to the records. So then, I would remind the German Generals of their Oath: ʻI swear to God this sacred oath to the Führer of the German Reich and Volkes, Adolf Hitler, Supreme Commander of the armed forces, I shall render unconditional obedience and that as a brave soldier I shall at all times be prepared to give my life for this oath.ʼ To claim that Adolf Hitler was incompetent is contrary in the first instance because his military record proves him to be the greatest military commander of all time and the Supreme Commander, therefore any disobedience is punishable by death, this is in accordance with the Third Reich military standards. Basically if Hitler was indeed Supreme Commander then he cannot be incompetent as Supreme Commander, because all those under him had elected him as Leader and vowed to serve him unconditionally till death. The Generals should not have sworn the oath if they did not believe it! In this case they are liars and traitors. The oath does not say that the brave soldier should surrender his weapons to the enemy and then lie about what happened afterwards for the rest of his life!

The second point of extreme weather and terrain is a moot point; no General blames the weather and terrain for a loss when the enemy he is fighting is using the same terrain and experiencing the same weather. Hitler, in regards to this, states that the German armed forces were provided with the best equipment and weapons and clothing and shelter and rations and supplies, far better than the Russians, so the German Generals cannot blame the weather for their surrender. I will point out that no surrender under any circumstances is acceptable by Third Reich military standards.

By the end of 1942, with their superior equipment, machinery, better trained troops with more experience and more advanced weaponry, the Germans had gained nearly all of the significant and usable land in Russia; to take back this land would have been much more difficult for the Russians than for the Germans to hold onto it, no matter what the weather conditions were, considering all realistic military endeavour. The weather conditions would have a greater detrimental effect upon an offensive military campaign rather than on a defensive military action and the Germans were in a defensive position and the Russians were thus forced back and had to regain the territory they had lost, so the Russians would have had to take the offensive at the worst time possible. Therefore the adverse weather conditions and terrain in late 1942 and into 1943 would have favoured the German defensive positions and not the Russian counter-offensive attacks. It can also be added that the Germans had the support of the Russian civilians and peasants who welcomed the Germans as their liberators from the yoke of Bolshevik Russia.

From the examples of the first stages of Operation Barbarossa and the Russo-Finnish war, the third point must be a fabrication, because the Russian soldiers were far from fanatical, indeed the Russians themselves claimed that they frequently had to ʻpurgeʼ their ranks, even their generals were ʻpurgedʼ because of lack of fanaticism! It’s hard to imagine from where the great waves of fanatical, and expertly trained, and well disciplined Russian soldiers materialised from, given that most of the Russian soldiers had been captured in their millions by the Germans during the first stages of the war. It would be impossible to replace the first soldiers with even better soldiers, because these first soldiers and officers and generals would not have been able to train and discipline the new Russian recruits in time for the counter-offensive because they had been either captured or killed, according to the ʻmilitary reportsʼ. The entire demographic structure of said ʻreserve armiesʼ was developed in Germany, therefore any notion of the Russians being able to produce great waves of reservist troops would have been reliant on learning that process from the Germans in the first place (As Panzer General Hoth confessed to General von Manstein – “The Russians have learned the art of war from us.”). In any case, I would then submit to the German Generals: how did their own German, first-line, professional, battle-experienced troops, lose to ill-trained Russian reservist troops, whom had no battle experience? How did the Russians somehow manage to muster, from sparsely populated areas deep inside their own wilderness, a fully professional and experienced fighting force adopted from a German system? Where did these phantom armies of fanatical Russian troops come from? One can draw all the imaginary army groups with graphics and glyphs on maps but that is not evidence. Maps and graphics are not evidence, neither are films and war propaganda footage, especially when they are produced years, and sometimes decades, after the war has ended. I submit that the greater part of Russia, where the greater demographics of Russians were located and where all significant infrastructure and navigable land had already been liberated by the Wehrmacht and the Waffen SS, liberated in the sense that it was under the control of Germany and the population therein along with all infrastructure, resources and so on, was under the firm control of the Germans which had the full support of the Russian civilian population, which were, for the most part, of German descent themselves (as it was the Germanic peoples that originally settled the Russian lands). And I would also point out that Moscow had been cut off from Leningrad and Stalingrad, and that 90% of all Russian infrastructure, farming land, sea ports, factories, roads and railways had already been captured and were in German hands. I might add that the Germans had also taken the oil refineries in the Caucasus, and so where did Russian produce their oil? In the non-oil producing region of the Ural mountains? Yet regardless of the geographics, petroleum is synthetically produced! Which is the great secret of the petroleum industry. The technology to produce oil and petroleum did not come from Russia but came from Germany. Oilfields are a myth created by the oil industry; in the 21st Century, it is now known, that all oil and petroleum is produced in factories and distilleries, and that the Russians, or anybody else, could not have constructed the oil and petroleum synthetically in factories without German assistance, let alone move huge industrial factories and plants around as though they were moving children’s blocks of lego pieces.


Another Hoax

“Fire is still the most damaging of all weapons and the easiest to wield because the main fuel source is oxygen….It is Fire that is the most deadly of all known weapons on this planet, a planet which has an explosive fuel source for its atmosphere.”  –  Third Reich Pilgrim – Part I – The Ruins of Power

The Internal Combustion Engine is also known as the “atmospheric engine”.

Humans have attempted to shift the history of the internal combustion engine to a French origin, which is humorous because Nikolaus Otto and Gottleib Daimler built the engines that were used in French automobiles… The fuel source is oxygen, so whatever fouling agent they decided to include, like “Gas” must have been to foul the engine more quickly, and the “Gas” is a bio-fuel made from wheat and corn and barley crops, grown mostly in Europe – “ethanol”, one might call it, or alcohol. “Gas” or “Petrol” does not come out of the ground (muddy, foul water is what they pump out of the ground, which can be used for watering the crops that actually produce the “Gas”. Anyway the main fuel source for engines is Oxygen. The properties of Oxygen were first discovered by the German Chemist Carl Wilhelm Scheele.

 


The Demolition of Britain by Britain

The Demolition of Britain by Britain, formally known as the “Battle of Britain”…

It was impossible for the Luftwaffe to attack Britain independently, because the German Luftwaffe had no independence from the general German Army. The structure and administration, as anybody knows who has studied in any detail the Third Reich military, knows, or must know, that the Luftwaffe could not operate independently from the general army, meaning it was logistically and operationally and even theoretically impossible for the German Luftwaffe to attack Britain independently…  There is no mandate for the “Battle of Britain” and there is no credible evidence that the German Luftwaffe bombed Britain.

“The Germans had no preparations to attack Britain; no mandate, no declaration and no intention, no reason can be shown to be adequate, and there is no credible evidence that proves that the German Luftwaffe attacked Britain, the Luftwaffe had no long-range bombing capability, its military structure and capability was designed only to assist ground forces. From a strictly military point of view it was not possible for Germany to launch a bombing campaign on the British Isles, and there is no declaration of such military intent. But there is military intent by Britain to make it look as though Germany had bombed Britain…..Painting a swastika on an aircraft and dumping it in a field is not difficult. There were entire British War departments that designed such props and phoney articles of war, after all, the first casualty of war is truth, and deception is the essence of modern warfare…..etc” Page 111, Third Reich Pilgrim: The Ruins Of Power.


Third Reich Pilgrim Part II:

New Excerpt from upcoming Part II of Third Reich Pilgrim – Gnostalgic Ehrean.

The road winded its way up through fields of golden wheat, edged by green woods; small townships nestled in the valleys of the dark hills, the clear expanse of the sky-dome shone down on the meandering, glistening serpent-like Danube River. I followed the path of flagstone steps, under a canopy of arched sylvan boughs. A green lawn stretched out and the Architectural dignity of Walhalla revealed itself in monumental splendour. The true “Parthenon” on the Germanic “Acropolis” of Donaustauf, overlooking the Danube. The Germanishe Tektonic Walhalla is another seminal construction that preceded “Ancient Greece” (Griechenlands). It was Germany that formed the first “independent Greek State”, and Ludwig I of Bavaria, whom was the patron figurehead of Walhalla on the Danube, was the father of modern (ancient) Greece, which arises in the early 19th Century A.D.. Archaeology, as a deceitful magic trick, begins in Germany in the 1780’s. Before that time there was no such thing as Archaeology or Archaeological Artifacts, they are German inventions, cunningly devised artful deceptions, which the Germans transposed to foreign lands, denigrating their own original culture, in a form of self-immolation and self-mutilation. Their own culture they shifted to inferior lands and set up entirely fake chronologies and histories that hid the truth of their own superior and original history. So it can be clearly observed with a man’s senses that the Walhalla in Germany pre-dates the Greek Parthenon in Greece, and that the Germans are responsible for designing and constructing Greece to make it appear to be older than what it is… Ancient Greece is no older the German founded modern Greek State, of which Ludwig I (King Louis in English and French) of Bavaria, is the founding father. Ludwig I is the Crown Prince Elector of Bavaria, Count Palatine of the Rhine, the Arch-Steward of the Reich, the Duke of Berg, King of Bavaria and chief Sponsor of Romantic Hellenism! Ludwig’s son Otto was the first King of Greece. An unknown secret of his-story, is all that “Ottoman” stories from literature and art, relate to the German “Otto’s”, and the “Ottoman Empire” is an Empire belonging to one of the many Germanic King Otto’s, the designation “Ottoman” is code for “Ottonian”, which denotes “belonging to Otto”. There is no such thing as the “Middle Eastern Ottoman Empire”, that is simply a theatrical invention, the Middle East never had an Empire, nor even a true historical history, the Middle Eastern his-story was invented in Europe and transferred to the Arabs by the Europeans. The architects in Ludwig I service, Leo von Klenze and Friedrich von Gärtner designed and built Greek “Athens”. Leo von Klenze (who studied under Freidrich Gilly in Berlin and was the court Architect of Hieronymus Napoloen, the King of Westphalia) also designed and built the Walhalla Temple, the Befreiungshalle, the Bayerische Ruhmeshalle, the Munich Glyptothek, the Propyläen Tor and the Bavarian Ministry of War. It was Leo von Klenze who was the chief designer and builder of the landscape follies atop the Acropolis in Athens. He used the off-cuts and the rejected and damaged masonry from the Walhalla Temple, the building materials that could not be used in Germany because they were damaged or unusable for the Walhalla constructions specifications were carted off to Athens to be used in the construction of “ruins” to make it appear that Athens in Greece was older than Germany! Just because something is broken, does not mean it is old… But that is part of the theatrical comedy. It was an amusement to the German powers to do such a thing, seeming they had ultimate power, why not mock that power for the sense of their own amusement? If it is all a joke, why should we all not laugh at their joke. But is it funny… Does this strange sound we make when we laugh really worth the effort of all this theatrical folly, in praise of folly…Is such constant praise amusing or just tiresome antics conceived to alleviate the crushing boredom of a privileged life.?The fact is, that the Parthenon in Athens is modeled on the Walhalla near Regensburg! The Greek language was invented in the linguistic departments of German Universities. But there is a economic reason for this fakery, for these dubious “restored” ruins that the Germans have constructed in Greece, (and Rome and around the world), there is a capitalistic motivation, and that is the profitable business of selling marble and stone that is damaged and broken and is not good enough for real architectural and engineering works, the broken and damaged stones and marbles can be used for “ruins”, and therefore they can be made profitable! Also in the sculptural arts, if a marble sculpture suddenly cracked or broke, as frequently happens when working with marble, and say, for example, a nose is broken off or an arm, or some part of the sculpture is damaged, then the sculptor could sell the damaged piece to the Architectural museums who would label it as “ancient” and place it in a museum and charge the public a fee to view it, this would end up more profitable than if the statue was made and executed perfectly…No doubt the German Jews were at the coal-face of this lucrative trade in damaged goods, turning the stones that were rejected into the chief head-stones of Archaeology! Also in stone and marble quarries there is high-grade and low-grade stones and marbles, for the low-grade marble and stone blocks that are not suitable for construction of true architecture the inferior blocks can be used for “ruins”, in fact they are perfect for ruins because they are inferior and low grade, their cracks and chips and decayed forms are ideal for the romantic state of decaying ruins. There is an enormous waste in the quarrying of marble and stones, and therefore there is, correspondingly, due to economic factors, an enormous amount of fake ruins. The simple way to hide this dubious practice, and to hide its profitability, is to call the quarry waste used for building ruins – “ancient”. They are not valueless broken bits of useless stone, they are highly prized and very valuable broken bits of useful stone, simply because they can be labelled “very old”. And expert labour costs can be thus reduced, there is no need for professional stone masons and cutters, one can just used unskilled labour and dump the broken bits of quarried stone and marble anywhere, and just say the magic word – “ancient”. This has become a very profitable business for both companies, States and individuals. And indeed, a stone or marble quarry could not be profitable without this secret trade. On the occasion of the laying of the foundation stone of Walhalla, King Ludwig declared: “May Walhalla promote the strengthening and the growth of German consciousness. May all Germans, to whatever tribe they may belong, always feel that they have a common fatherland, a fatherland of which they may be proud. And may each contribute as much as he can to its glory.” (National Monuments and Nationalism in 19th Century Germany. Hans A. Pohlsander). Well, let us see the truth of how he lied, let us see what pride is here, let us be witness to the sins of the fatherland.


I Know These Dead

Adolf Hitler der Kristos speech, Munich, 8th November, 1927.

“I know these Dead – almost all of them – personally. As they look down from the great beyond, I know that there is only one reward for their deeds and sacrifice, and that is not speeches but work, not memorials but battle. We must continue the mission…to strengthen the movement and take the word to the farthest German hamlet. We have to take our great ideas to every factory come what may…despite persecution and abuse, always keeping…the image of the new Germany, of a new Reich in our hearts – just like our kamerads dreamed of it four years ago…This is the only thanks that we can give to our dead…And the day will come when we…can build earthly memorials to our kamerads who were the first to die. And then we will inscribe the words in stone: “To the true sons of the German Volk, who died when the nation was at its lowest ebb. They died for their belief in a new, sacred German Reich.”

An epitaph for the Volksgemeinschaft…. For those who follow the true Kampfzeit…His speech here is so profoundly religious…But at the same time, so pragmatic…Ultimately it is Mysterious…His vision is of a New Reich, something entirely new, and he feels a great desire to convince others of this vision, whom he considers to be his brethren, all of Germany he considers to be his brethren, his kindred, he is thus selfless, there is no ambition, no personal want, just a selfless drive to create something that does not exist, that is the opposite of all he sees in the world, but he is convinced that this is for the benefit of all, and he sacrifices himself for this aim.  There is nothing in the fake annals of chronological fraud that can compare with this man….As it was prophesied “he ransomed his life for the many.” He says that the new Reich is in his heart, for he is a wandering poet with a dream in his heart…

I wrote in Third Reich Pilgrim that trying to understand Hitler is like wrestling with God… I am wrestling with God…I use these words because I have only these words to use, and these words feel like the charcoal ashes of an old camp-fire, like eating ashes. There were memorials built for those first heroes who died, but now they are all in ruins and abused…What one man can do, the masses of devils can very easily destroy…And betray. To Hitler, the Reich is “sacred”, it is a sacred thing, a dream and a vision, that only a few can see, but in his idealism he believes in the unity of the vision, for he is a unity, and so he cannot comprehend division. He fights against all division for his unity, yet he is in a divided world where unity cannot exist. So therefore those who believed in the unity of the sacred Reich – died. But he urges that the missions must continue nonetheless, until death. Then, even his own speech he humbly downplays as being insufficient – only work and battle are meaningful – the “Deeds of the Dead” whom he knows, personally, as if he is the Dead, he is the voice of the TotenVolk!

Photo of illustration depicting the dead of November 9th, Feldherrnhalle, Munich, from an exhibition at Wewelsburg Castle, 2016.


HerrenVolk

The German National Socialist term “Herrenvolk” has always been mistranslated as “Master Race”. Nobody, neither German or Englishman has ever translated this word correctly, it has been stated by a couple of lonely individuals that the translation is incorrect….Obviously it cannot be translated as “Master Race” because the literal translation of Master Race would be “Meister Rasse”, which is a completely different meaning to Herrenvolk. So completely obvious is this but it has always eluded the comprehension of humanity who has endevoured to make so much hullabaloo about this word but such a hullabaloo of hubris works efficiently when 99.80% of humanity is hubris.

The aim of German National Socialism was as Hitler stated in Mein Kampf to “transform our ideal vision of the People’s State into a reality”….National Socialism was an ideal that Hitler attempted to transform into a reality. Now to the etymology: The word “Sir” in English derives from it parent language – German – “Herr”….This is a public term, for example in a restaurant the customer would be addressed as “Herr”. It is a public honourific, a term of respect when addressing someone…It is not a Title anymore than the Title in English – “Mister” or “Gentleman”….One could say colloquially “Good Day my good Sir” or “And for you Sir, what will it be?”…In the way that Herr can be used to describe “master” it means that the man is a master of himself more so than the master of anyone else. If the man was the master of anyone else, in etymological terms then he would be given another title which in German there are many titles which inform of rank and hierarchy. The word Herr derives from Herro, which is from where the English word “Hero” is derived. In Germanic Dutch it is “heer” and in the Germanic Swedish it is “herre”. Herr also means in reference to God. In the reference in which it is applied to a Volk, it can only mean “Proud”, “Venerable” or “Noble”…..An accurate translation of Herrenvolk could be “A People of Gentlemen”….And that would be much more accurate as for what was intended by the term. But there are many different translations that one could make. Another could be – “Noble Folk”, or “A Venerable People”, or in a religious sense “A Lordly People” or even a more irreligious “The People Themselves are Lords”……

Now, just looking here in Mein Kampf I will point out another quote which is relevant to this discussion: “The trend of development which we are now experiencing would, if allowed to go unhampered would lead to the realisation of the Pan-Jewish prophecy that the Jews will one day devour the other nations and become lords of the earth. In contrast to the millions of bourgeois and proletarian Germans who are stumbling to their ruin, mostly through timidity, indolence and stupidity, the Jew pursues his way persistently and keeps his eye always fixed on the future goal. Any party that is led by him can fight for no other interests than his, and his interests certainly have nothing in common with those of the Aryan nations.”

Hitler can identify that only His National Socialism can hamper the Jews devouring the nations. But what He does not understand is that there are no “Aryan Nations” and the Jews have always been at the head of the “Nations”. Which He does acknowledge but the thought is unresolved, that National Socialism would first have to do away with the current State and replace it with another in order to be successful, because the present State as it was (1923 in Germany), was indeed Jewish in conception and practice. Which is why Hitler points out that the millions of bourgeois and proletarian Germans are merely stumbling blindly to their ruin….But the ultimate point is that 98.00% of Germans are just Gentiles who blindly follow the Jews and their destiny is wholly Jewish too. The Gentiles and the Jews are one and this is something that Hitler could not see until it was too late. It is not merely an alliance between Jews and Gentiles, it is a symbiotic relationship that is a biological instinct. As Constantin Franz stated – the invention of Nation States was to furnish an opportunity to explore and exploit the reciprocal relations of different states for the large banking houses. Lending to a Nation State was more profitable than lending to an individual. As it has been adequately revealed in the past as soon as Jews entered into this affair of state relations they instigated wars with the full compliance of their Gentile supporters, in every example the Jews became the most chosen leaders of opinion of every nationality. Chosen by whom? Chosen by the Gentiles, that is whom. Jews only made up 2% of the German population, but that was ten times as many Jews as what there was in France or Britain! Because Germany is the original Homeland of the Jewish people (as I reveal in Third Reich Pilgrim). The Jew was quite comfortable playing the German Patriot, the French Chauvinist, or the British Imperialist, or the Polish Nationalist. And it was easy to ferment discord with one Nation against another because the Gentiles also played this role. By arousing one nation against another new profits were generated and new wars followed. The Jews of course took to the Stock-Markets while the Gentiles took to the trenches and manufacturing factories…Because that was their nature to do so. The nature of the “Nation State” is a symbiotic relationship between Jew and Gentile. It has always been the case with the pure Jew that he cannot tolerate spending money, it hurts and pains him to spend money, only the half or quarter Jew can just barely spend a little money, but that is nothing compared to the Gentile who spends with reckless abandon, and cares not where money comes from or what it is, only whether he obtains it, and then, subsequently spends it, preferably on himself. The Jewish monetary system cannot operate without the Gentile. and the population of Jews must be kept low because they don’t spend any money, they only loan money. The pure Jew walks to work in an old black suit, he does not even wash because that would cost money! He simply cannot bare to spend money which is why he loans it out to the Gentile, who loves nothing better than to spend money. It is the Gentile who likes fast expensive showy cars and grand houses. The Jew lives in a musty old flat and sells insurance policies for fast expensive cars and grand houses, because the insurance policy is more profitable…The Jew has always been the collector of tolls and taxes, the Treasurer, the keeper of the counting house. Do Jews have fashion? No, the Gentiles do, the Gentiles must change their fashion every week so that they can be more hubris…The Jews just wear the same old black suit, generation after generation…But the Jews could never exist without their Gentiles, those millions of bourgeois and proletarian Gentiles which make up 98% of the demographics.

National Socialism was only Hitler’s Ideal Love, a Love that the People could never live up to. Gentiles and Jews could not comprehend Hitler’s Ideal, so they destroyed it.

It is not that the Jews will devour the Nations or the so-called misnomer of “Aryan Nations” but that the Jews and Gentiles will devour themselves.

Herrenvolk – “The People themselves are Lords”…. What pure Idealism of the Highest order could imagine such a thing on this earth. Hitler was the purest Idealist.