I had to revise my previous post, because I was not critical enough of Phoneyhenge, it is even more phoney than what I first thought. If I was able to do a site assessment it would probably only take me 15 min to work it out, but over the internet it takes a little longer, a few hours at least. Phoneyhenge is not even made of real stones. Because of the weight of real stones it would be a far more complex and therefore expensive operation to place them in-situ. The British government has used steel fabricated shells and then used a form of spray-on concrete that has then been molded using plaster-of-paris, various natural means have then been used to acquire an aged look. In construction and engineering it is weight dispersal of the structure over the foundation area that is crucial, the weight of the structure needs to be well distributed, large monolithic stones of great weight are therefore extremely difficult to stand up straight, especially in a post and lintel form on unstable foundations such as Salisbury plain which turns into a muddy bog seasonally. If the stones were real they would subside and topple over after about one year…The only way real stones could stand in those positions in that geographical area would be if the large and extensive foundation works had been excavated and formed, this would include huge concrete pads and tonnes and tonnes of steel reinforcement. Concrete pads and steel reinforcements are still required and have been used but they would not have to be as large if the stones were hollow faux stone, a mock -up. Stonehenge is actually a mock-up. It is not even real…All evidence, as the Russians have revealed in these photos from the 1950’s, point to that time as the date of construction for the mock-up Phoneyhenge, there may have been previous attempts by the British government working through the Public Works departments and the British War Department which owns Salisbury Plain. Salisbury Plain is the largest military training ground in England, hence the Military have been involved in its construction. As we know it is very easy for the All-Lies to also produce fake photos and all types of fake “evidence” to enforce their illusions on the gullible general public. The narratives also change over time, the narrative on the first design briefs for a landscape folly were Biblically based, for example a ruin that survived Noah’s flood, that then changed to the ruins being constructed originally by the “Ancient Romans”, and then it changed to “Stone-Age man”, and then sun-worshipping “Ancient Druids”, the narrative has changed several times…And will change again, but the stones are not real, the dates are not real, all of Phoneyhenge is just Phoney, a Folly, an Amusement.