A Kamerad emailed me with some sensible questions regarding my Nietzsche posts. So I will answer the questions here:
Question – In one of your articles you mentioned that the Protocols had listed Nietzsche along with Darwin and Marx as key subversives. I’ve never read before that Nietzsche was Jewish?
Answer – Yes, that is right, Nietzsche is mentioned along with Darwin and Marx as being key subversives in their agenda. The Protocols also say that they arrange publication and promotion on racial lines. Certain men are promoted over others due to their racial makeup, which is often a secret, indeed they are promoted if they are part of “the tribe”. The difficulty of course is of telling who is in the tribe and who is not, that is something ultimately only known by the secret Rabbis. Jews have proven themselves experts in disguising themselves. What these men share, despite the huge publication and promotional Capital resources that have been invested in them, is anti-Christian doctrines and totally Material doctrines focused primarily on the study of Nature as a dominant Force, and a final submission to this dominant material temporal Force; “I draw conclusion that by the law of Nature, right lies in force.” – The Protocols. That is true, any man of worldly experience can acknowledge that, it is true. But the Aryan refuses to submit to that Law, whereas the Jew – Darwin, Marx and Nietzsche, not only endorse this but celebrate and finally submit themselves totally to it, which is Jewish; submission to the Law enforced by their Geomantic Lord of Hosts – Jehovah. The fact that Darwin, Marx and Nietzsche may be dissimilar on many literary points is indifferent, dissimulation in literature is ubiquitous, especially in Jewish promoted literature, Nietzsche’s “philosophy” is a perfect example of this, with its pastiche of contradictory aphorisms, a mosaic arrangement of contradictory assertions and negations. Indeed one can extend this to the economic realm where the contradictory arrangements of Capitalism and Communism are set side by side by the same hand which settles in figures only, numerical figures.
Nietzsche’s best friends were Jewish, Lou Andreas-Salome and Paul Ree. Nietzsche reproached Wagner for his anti-Semitism. Nietzsche, from a wealthy family himself, considered himself to be a Polish Aristocrat, which is to say, in those days, anti-German, certainly Nietzsche is critical of Germans in every chance he gets, but seems favourable in a sentimental way to Judaism and the Jews, indeed Nietzsche refers to his “Shadow” as the “Wandering Jew”, but then immediately denies it, in typical Nietzsche fashion! He is definitely a slimy little fish to get a hold of. Nietzsche, as pointed out by Houston Stewart Chamberlain, borrowed and plagiarized all his writings, but then Nietzsche criticizes all those he borrowed from or ignores them, this type of behaviour is typically Jewish. Also, could not Nietzsche’s literary style, so loved by Jews, the world over, be described as essentially Jewish? Do you know what the word “Chutzpah” means? If a Rabbi was to write the meaning of Chutzpah he would write something like “beyond good and evil”, because Chutzpah is literally brazen, audacious outlandish behaviour , completely immoral; that switches everything, turns everything upside down and the wrong way about, confuses with a confidence rarely seen, for example a description of Chutzpah is “that quality in a man who, having killed his mother and father, throws himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan.” A denial of any wrong-doing, lack of conscience, a lack of awareness of responsibility, there is no awareness of wrong-doing. Chutzpah could also be described as a Great Swindle, a con-job, an audacious scam. In Nietzsche, everything is the wrong way about, and it all leads to nowhere, there is just an empty, shallow and a chameleon quality to it in the end, like someone is putting on an act.
“Go to thy woman with a whip.” – Nietzsche. But here Nietzsche is pretending to be whipped in a mocked stage scene. It’s all so essentially Jewish behaviour, here Nietzsche is depicted as donkey being whipped, as slave, and yet his “Philosophy” is the total opposite, supposedly the Aristocratic Warrior Overman to whom women are nothing but producers of children, which is of course the anti-feminine Judaic outlook on women. Nietzsche’s views, concerning women, in his books, are inline with a Rabbi’s views on women….Except Nietzsche appears to be somewhat confused, or as I have already stated, Nietzsche is not the writer of “Nietzsche” books?